The Saturday Slash

Don't be afraid to ask for help with the most critical first step of your writing journey - the query.

I’ve been blogging since 2011 and have critiqued over 200 queries here on the blog using my Hatchet of Death. This is how I edit myself, it is how I edit others. If you think you want to play with me and my hatchet, shoot me an email.

If the Saturday Slash has been helpful to you in the past, or if you’d like for me to take a look at your query please consider making a donation, if you are able.

If you’re ready to take the next step, I also offer editing services.

My thoughts are in blue, words to delete are in red, suggested rephrasing is in orange.

WOMAN IN THE PAINTING is an upmarket, dual-era romantic fiction with elements of magical realism, perfect for book clubs. Melding the sexy, playful humor of Christina Lauren’s THE SOULMATE EQUATION into the grand worldbuilding of THE INVISIBLE LIFE OF ADDIE LARUE, the happily-ever-after will appeal to anyone who wonders whether soulmate is more than a metaphor.

My first reaction has always been that your hook should come first - not comp titles or genre. Every querying author out there has comp titles and a genre. Start with what only you have - your hook, for your book.

Like me, Jude Christensen is half-Filipino, an art lover, and an unabashed Anglophile. Don't bring yourself into the body of the query. You can allude to your identity with the MC in your bio, but here is the place to focus on the fiction, the book itself. Also, you need a bigger hook than just describing your main character. Since acquiring an unsigned 19th-century portrait, the Seattle curator dreams he’s a Regency-era gallant in love with the bewitching Philomena, the woman in the painting. You might want to clarify "dreams" here. Is he actually asleep and dreaming, or is this a daydream / obsession? Obsessed with unmasking the secret artist to determine its value and perhaps make sense of his increasingly complex dreams, Jude is drawn to Philomena’s descendant, Dr. Marielle Heathcote, who has her same haunting eyes. It's a little more clear now that we are talking about actual dreams, but I think you might want to clarify sooner, to avoid any confusion. Also be careful with the use of the word "obsessed." By nature it has negative qualities attached to it, so it throws a certain shadow on the narrative - unless that's what you want. It's question of whether this interest is healthy or unhealhty.

Marielle is reluctant to sell her family’s treasures, but heirlooms are all she has to stave off bankruptcy. From Seattle to England, she and Jude embark on a romantic affair fueled by a shared zeal for art, literature, and solving the mystery of the painting. What is the mystery of the painting? And what does her financial situation have to do with it? Why are they on a road trip? How are all these things connected? Marielle’s chilling night terrors and regression therapy reveal an impossible Georgian-era love triangle. Forgotten journals from Heathcote Hall expose the painter to be Philomena’s husband—but he’s not the same man Jude sees with Philomena whenever he closes his eyes. Yet, Jude refuses to believe in past lives. So is this what they are doing with a road trip? I'm confused about the triangle. Philomena and her husband, but then also a third man that Jude can see... but it's not Jude? I thought he dreamt he was a gallant trying to romance Philomena?

To understand the gut-wrenching connection between Philomena, the disgraced father of her child, and his charming, steadfast friend who secretly loves him, Marielle and Jude must open their hearts to the possibility that this is not the first time they’ve fallen in love. I'm confused about who is who in this narrative, and how it relates to the modern characters. Told through the eyes of four characters in two parts: Part 1, His Other Half (the male gaze) and Part 2, Her Other Half (the female gaze) have alternating timelines and point-of-views. My debut novel is 122000 words and is the first of a planned “Soul Group” series. I would definitely state it's alternating POV's but you don't have to get that into the weeds with how it will be structured in a query. Your word count is way too high for a debut - you need to get it below 100k, and I would also do you best to get it in a place where you can pitch it as a stand alone with series potential.

In September, WOMAN IN THE PAINTING won third at the Pacific Northwest Writers Conference and is now a finalist in Romance Writers of America’s Romance Through the Ages contest. Since 2013, I’ve edited more than fifty novels and curated five anthologies. A member of the Jane Austen Society and Pacific Northwest Writers Association, I live in Washington State. My own whirlwind English fantasy came true thanks to actor Henry Cavill when we sipped champagne together atop the London Eye. True story. You can Google it

lol, I like the bio. I'd get the allusion to your own identity into that para, as well.

Right now I'd say your biggest problem is that I'm not really sure what the goal is. Figure out who painted the painting? What it's worth? Which one of them is someone else from the past, and if they've been in love before? Right now, it's got a nice romantic, historial and mystery vibe, but I don't really see what the obstacle is. Is there a threat from the past that can damage their current love? What is the goal and what is the obstacle?

As you can see from my above comments, I'm also a little in the weeds about the tangled identities. I think you might need to present it in a more simplistic way.

The Saturday Slash

Don't be afraid to ask for help with the most critical first step of your writing journey - the query.

I’ve been blogging since 2011 and have critiqued over 200 queries here on the blog using my Hatchet of Death. This is how I edit myself, it is how I edit others. If you think you want to play with me and my hatchet, shoot me an email.

If the Saturday Slash has been helpful to you in the past, or if you’d like for me to take a look at your query please consider making a donation, if you are able.

If you’re ready to take the next step, I also offer editing services.

My thoughts are in blue, words to delete are in red, suggested rephrasing is in orange.

It’s just another regular, boring summer Friday night in small-town Upstate New York for painfully average You've done a great job here of using a bunch of words that are going to immediately turn someone off. Introducing anything as boring, regular, or average isn't great language to use in a hook sixth-grader Ben Grishop and his friends Joe and Dana—until they’re abducted by aliens and informed by the Almighty Extraterrestrial Ruler of the Universe (coined by Ben himself) I feel like "coined" isn't great wording to use in an MG query that they, through sheer luck alone, Eh... dumb luck isn't compelling. I know you're probably trying to counteract the "chosen one" trope, but you put a lot of effort into telling us how normal / boring these kids are. So why are they going to save the world? are the only three beings in the universe who can save it from imminent total destruction. Right here is the ending of your hook sentence. All the way down here. Get this quick, concise, and above all - not inferring that anything about the beginning of this book is boring. Reading is an escape. Reading about characters who are bored is not an escape. All they have to do is push a tiny red button constructed by the aliens over the course of millennia within twenty-four hours. Confused. It took aliens a millenia to create a button?

But before they get a chance to, the aliens’ spaceship is attacked by what the aliens call “an immensely powerful, evil force from The Realm Beyond.” In a desperate attempt to save Ben and his friends, the aliens dump them on a random, distant planet full of giant, man-eating, French-speaking crabs. lol, I mean, of course they speak French Now, before time runs out, Ben and his friends must find a way to survive the deadly planet and reconvene with the aliens, so they can push the button and save the universe from oblivion.

I feel like there's a lot missing here. We need more of a goal than "push a button" and we need to have a feeling for who these kids are. Boring, average kids are not compelling characters, and dumb luck isn't what drives a plot, neither is the single act of pushing a button. Give us a better feel of the group dynamic, what's at stake for each kid (not just a generic "end of the world" scenario). The world is always ending these days - why is this version special, and why should we root for this kids to save us?

If what you're going for here is more a of Shaun of the Dead "everyman given an impossible task" / implausible hero, you'll need to get more of the tongue-in-cheek, humorous voice injected into the query. Right now it's coming off as a slightly, rambling SF adventure with characters who are just kind of meh about everything - including the end of the world. If you want your reader to care, the characters need to care, too.

The Saturday Slash

Don't be afraid to ask for help with the most critical first step of your writing journey - the query.

I’ve been blogging since 2011 and have critiqued over 200 queries here on the blog using my Hatchet of Death. This is how I edit myself, it is how I edit others. If you think you want to play with me and my hatchet, shoot me an email.

If the Saturday Slash has been helpful to you in the past, or if you’d like for me to take a look at your query please consider making a donation, if you are able.

If you’re ready to take the next step, I also offer editing services.

My thoughts are in blue, words to delete are in red, suggested rephrasing is in orange.

He dropped to one knee, and she ran for the hills. Great hook! After annihilating her happily ever after, Fern is only certain of one thing: marriage to her long-term boyfriend felt a lot like settling, and she wants more than a safe bet. Displaced to her late grandparents’ farmhouse, the makeup artist is intent on organizing her family’s treasures and her own life. What does that mean? Is she shorting through their old stuff? Is she a city girl that is transplanted? Or does she fit in here? A little bit more on that end would fit nicely here. Instead she finds a certainty she didn’t know existed, and a place to plant her biggest dreams. But even the most idyllic havens can be mirages. This feels a little too much like a summary too early on. I'd cut, and cover these elements later in the query.

Fern grapples with clearing out the nostalgic property, and the loss of this part of her history, too. Again, this feels like a nod to her fitting / not-fitting here. A little more about how she is or is not a fish out of water would be good. As the house sale looms—along with her eviction date—she braves farmhouse misadventures, What does this mean? Like home improvements? and her neighbor, Wes, steps in to lend a hand. With Wes, Fern feels more grounded than ever before, and sparks illuminate their tract of land, revealing a path to their future. Even as Fern is finding the place she belongs, her ex draws her back into his life. And Wes’ roots in the small town are tangled with ties he can’t easily cut—like the family business he's sworn his life to, the football field where he played and now watches his daughter do cartwheels, and his high-school sweetheart bent on reconciliation. A lot packed in here - why would Wes' roots matter or be a problem? Does she want him to move back to where she came from? Does she not want to stay here? And how is the ex luring her back in if she already decided he felt like settling?

Just as quickly as they appeared, Fern’s big dreams disappear before her eyes. But what's her new dream? How is it disappearing? When crisis strikes with a shocking accident, Don't tease here. We need to know what the accident is. the divide between Fern and Wes stretches wider, and the roads back home are so inviting that neither is sure which way is forward. The metaphor feels mixed, if the rood is so inviting how do you not know which way to go? Uprooted again, Fern wonders if home was an illusion all along, and if her already battered heart can withstand another break—or if she’s simply meant to settle, not settle down. Hmm... what's the difference between those two things?

I don't really understand what's at stake. We need to know - very clearly - what Fern wants, and what is standing in the way of it. I think this query is decent enough, but you need to clariy the main problem - what does Fern want? And, it does sound like the question of home and belonging is a pretty big theme, so I'd work that in more. I don't have an idea for how Fern feels about this farm life - is THIS home? Or is where she left behind home?