On Submission with Lisa Maxwell

If there's one thing that many aspiring writers have few clues about, it's the submission process. There are good reasons for that; authors aren't exactly encouraged to talk in detail about our own submission experiences, and - just like agent hunting - everyone's story is different. I managed to cobble together a few non-specific questions that some debut authors have agreed to answer (bless them). And so I bring you the submission interview series - Submission Hell - It's True. Yes, it's the SHIT.

Today's guest is debut Lisa Maxwell, whose title SWEET UNREST will be available from Flux in the Fall of 2014.

18402202.jpg

How much did you know about the submission process before you were out on subs yourself?

Honestly, not much. My agent gave me a list of editors and publishers, and kept me updated with replies, but otherwise, I didn’t know much else. That’s kind of the way I wanted it, though. That’s one of the biggest reasons I went through the process of getting an agent—I wanted someone else to worry about the business side of things, so I could write.

Did anything about the process surprise you?

One surprise was how lovely most of the replies were. After querying and experiences the “no response means no” or the typical “not right for me” responses that agents often rely on, it was a nice surprise to get kind words for rejections.

The biggest surprise, though, was how long the submissions process took. I went on submission for SWEET UNREST in July of 2011. It sold in May of 2013. I’d written two more manuscript drafts and had really, emotionally moved on from that story when I found out it actually sold, because I figured that if it hadn’t sold in a year, it wasn’t going to. People always say that publishing is a slow process, but I had no idea.

Did you research the editors you knew had your ms? Do you recommend doing that?

I didn’t research them. I felt like it was out of my hands at the time. I’m not sure what researching an editor would have done for me other than increase my anxiety.

That being said, I think that there are a lot of small, independent e-presses that some agents are starting to send things to more now. If we’d gotten that far, I think I would have researched the editors (and the publishers) and would have been more active in my opinion about where the book should be submitted.

What was the average amount of time it took to hear back from editors?

In the first round, anywhere from a couple of weeks to a month or so.

What do you think is the best way for an author out on submission to deal with the anxiety?

The only way I dealt with it was to forget about it, which is so much easier said than done. But really, once a book is on submission, it’s out of the author’s hands. It’s either going to sell or it’s not. You really have to start writing the next book. If you’re working on something new, whether a book sells or not matters slightly less, because you have a new Bright and Shiny thing to play with, new characters to fall in love with, and—maybe most importantly—you know that the book on submission is not The One And Only book that you’ll ever write.

If you had any rejections, how did you deal with that emotionally? How did this kind of rejection compare to query rejections?

Quick confession: I am not a sunshine and lollipops optimist when it comes to this business. I think I went through this whole process not *quite* believing that it would work. I’m a researcher at heart, so when I decided to try writing fiction and getting it published, I researched like crazy. I read all sorts of best-selling authors talk about piles of trunked manuscripts or about how their first submission(s) didn’t sell, so part of me saw this whole experience putting in my time on the rejection train.

That’s not to say that the rejections didn’t sting, but most of them were lovely and complimentary, and many of them had more to do with market and timing than anything about the work itself. In that way, these were somewhat easier to deal with than query rejections. Not easy, but easier.

If you got feedback on a rejection, how did you process it? How do you compare processing an editor’s feedback as compared to a beta reader’s?

Most of my feedback wasn’t all that specific in terms of problems with the story. I got a handful of “it just didn’t click for me” rejections and a handful of “we just bought a book too much like this” rejections. Mostly, I took them at face value, filed them away in my email archive, and tried to make the new story I was writing better.

When you got your YES! how did that feel? How did you find out – email, telephone, smoke signal?

I actually found out by email. I was sitting on my bed (because, apparently, I’m incapable of using a desk for anything writing related) and my husband was sitting there too, and the email came from my agent that I had an offer. It was just completely bizarre. Here, this book that I’d written ages ago, that I’d really not been thinking about as a possibility, and it was the thing that was going to go out in the world and make me an author. I kind of slapped at my husband’s leg and pointed at the screen…and then I called my mom. Telling my mom made it feel slightly more real, and I think that’s when I really started to get excited.

Did you have to wait a period of time before sharing your big news, because of details being ironed out? Was that difficult?

I, luckily, didn’t have to wait all that long. It was only a few weeks after I got the news that the announcement was up on Publishers Marketplace and I could tell people. But, yeah, even a few weeks and it was difficult not to tell everyone or hire one of those banner planes at the beach or something.

How I Name (Or Don't) My Characters

I know there are writers who put a lot of thought into naming their characters. Name origin, ethnic connotations, new and inventive spellings of old names - you name it (pun intended) it's been done. And yes, there are some pretty cool ways to go about naming your characters.

But, I'm just not one of those writers.

I'm what I call an extreme pantster. I don't do any planning or plotting, and there's sure as hell no outlining in my world. I generally know what's going to happen and how the story will end, but I don't know how it will unfold.

I don't even know my character's names.

When I was writing this post I was reminded of a Neil Gaiman quote from Coraline:

“What's your name,' Coraline asked the cat. 'Look, I'm Coraline. Okay?"
"Cats don't have names," it said.
"No?" said Coraline.
"No," said the cat. "Now you people have names. That's because you don't know who you are. We know who we are, so we don't need names.”

Not only is this a great example of how cheeky cats could be if they spoke English, but it's also how I think of my characters before I need to assign them a jumble of pronounceable letters that we call a name. Who they are is what's important, not what I'll call them.

I generally think of them as Girl Character, Boy Character, Quirky Friend, Silly Pedestrian... whatever the situation calls for. This is how my brain accesses that character file right up to the point in the manuscript where common sense demands they have a name, at which time I have them tell me.

I stop for a beat, and say, "What's your name?" And they tell me.

In the case of NOT A DROP TO DRINK I needed a name pretty quickly. I knew the first line of the book long before I started writing it -- "Girl Character was nine the first time she killed to defend the pond." But, that doesn't quite have what it takes, does it?

So I asked, and she told me her name was Lynn.

I was like - "WOW! That's a totally perfect name! Your mom would have picked a practical one-syllable name because she might have to yell for you in dangerous situations. She needed something quick, something that would carry in the wind. Yeah. That makes total sense. Your name is Lynn."

How serendipitous was it that much later - as in, months - I looked up the meaning of her name and it's derived from the Gaelic for pond or lake, and is usually used for someone who lives near water.

Um, yeah. She totally knew what she was doing.

Wednesday WOLF - Hacker

I've got a collection of random information in my brain that makes me an awesome Trivial Pursuit partner, but is completely useless when it comes to real world application. Like say, job applications. I thought I'd share some of this random crap with you in the form of another acronym-ific series. I give you - Word Origins from Left Field - that's right, the WOLF. Er... ignore the fact that the "from" doesn't fit.

wolf.png

I thought I'd share with you the origin of the term hacker.

The word itself has been around for awhile, most always with a negative connotation. It seems that at one time a hacker was someone who made furniture using only an axe as their tool, with the end result being that their furniture... well, kind of sucked. Later on the word hack was used as a noun to describe someone doing routine drudge work, and I hate to tell you this but it was most commonly applied to writers. In turn, this may have influenced the usage of the word when it came to writing computer software, and it looks like that's where it made the jump from the page to the keyboard - as early as the 1960's.